Wells Fargo

United States

$1.95T in Total Assets

Qualitative Analysis

FinanceMap scores this financial institution in the following areas. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis

FinanceMap Scores

Governance Score

Policy Engagement Score

Top Line Target

Net Zero

Portfolio Analysis

FinanceMap assesses these portfolios for this financial institution. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis.

Activity Stream
Value Assessed
Portfolio Paris Alignment Score
Exposure to Fossil Fuels
Corporate Lending
$392B
-25%
6.6%
Bond Underwriting
$162B
-29%
9.0%
Equity Underwriting
$27.1B
-2%
5.2%

Governance

D+
Performance Band

51%
Organisation Score

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Wells Fargo

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions climate governance, targets and policies. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portfolio Paris Alignment analysis of this institution's activities in this portfolio area in 2020–2021.

Corporate Lending Paris Alignment

Value Assessed: $392B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors to which this portfolio has exposure. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.

Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portfolio Paris Alignment analysis of this institution's activities in this portfolio area in 2020–2021.

Bond Underwriting Paris Alignment

Value Assessed: $162B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors to which this portfolio has exposure. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.

Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portfolio Paris Alignment analysis of this institution's activities in this portfolio area in 2020–2021.

Equity Underwriting Paris Alignment

Value Assessed: $27.1B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors to which this portfolio has exposure. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.

Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Policy Engagement

D+
Performance Band

58%
Organisation Score

43%
Relationship Score

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Wells Fargo

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions’ sustainable finance policy engagement. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Wells Fargo - Relationships

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party.

In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.

Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
44%
 
44%
 
45%
 
45%
 
42%
 
42%
 
57%
 
57%
 
58%
 
58%
 
40%
 
40%
 
14%
 
14%
 
49%
 
49%
 
30%
 
30%
 
41%
 
41%
 
46%
 
46%
 
60%
 
60%
 
53%
 
53%
 
47%
 
47%