BNY Mellon

United States

$1.91T in AUM

Qualitative Analysis

FinanceMap scores this financial institution in the following areas. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis

FinanceMap Scores

Policy Engagement Score

Top Line Target

Portfolio Analysis

FinanceMap assesses these portfolios for this financial institution. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis.

Activity Stream
Value Assessed
Portfolio Paris Alignment Score
Exposure to Fossil Fuels
Equity Asset Management
$95.8B
-23%
5.9%

Exposure Analysis

Last Updated - 28/02/2023

Fossil fuel companies are those whose primary sector falls within coal mining and services, or up-, mid-, and downstream oil and gas sectors. Green companies are defined as companies having over 75% revenue deriving from Substantial Contribution to Mitigation activities under the EU Taxonomy.

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Equity Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portion of AUM Assessed: $95.8B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors in which the asset manager has shareholdings. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.
Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Brazilian Electric Power Co29.1%
Exelon Corp9.4%
Enel SpA7.9%
Eneva SA5.3%
CLP Holdings Ltd5.3%
Vistra Corp4.2%
Dominion Energy Inc3.6%
OGE Energy Corp3.6%
Clearway Energy Inc2.9%
CMS Energy Corp2.3%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Volkswagen AG34.8%
Mercedes Benz Group AG20.4%
General Motors Co19.4%
Suzuki Motor Corp7.1%
Geely Automobile Holdings Ltd4.5%
Ford Motor Co4.1%
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd1.8%
Toyota Motor Corp1.6%
Stellantis NV1.4%
Tesla Inc1.1%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Glencore PLC56.0%
CONSOL Energy Inc17.4%
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd14.1%
Warrior Met Coal Inc6.2%
Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd1.7%
Peabody Energy Corp1.5%
Arch Resources Inc1.2%
Coal India Ltd1.2%
Adaro Energy Indonesia TBK PT0.6%
Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc0.2%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobras58.6%
EQT Corp10.6%
Antero Resources Corp2.6%
Southwestern Energy Co2.5%
BP PLC2.5%
Shell PLC2.3%
CNX Resources Corp2.2%
Range Resources Corp2.1%
Exxon Mobil Corp1.9%
Chesapeake Energy Corp1.9%

Funds Assessed

All equity funds that FinanceMap has identified as being managed by this asset manager. Click through to a fund's profile page to view in-depth analysis.
Fund Name
Fund Domicile
TNA
Exposure
Portfolio Paris Alignment
United States
$19.9B
4.0%
-15%
United States
$5.3B
3.7%
-22%
United Kingdom
$4.41B
12.4%
-18%
United States
$2.67B
14.8%
-19%
United States
$2.62B
8.2%
-21%
United States
$2.58B
2.4%
N/A
United Kingdom
$2.01B
0%
N/A
United States
$1.99B
11.1%
-16%
United States
$1.92B
8.2%
-21%
United States
$1.67B
5.7%
-16%
United States
$1.66B
4.1%
-15%
United States
$1.65B
8.0%
-21%
United Kingdom
$1.63B
24.7%
-2%
United States
$1.51B
8.3%
-13%
United States
$1.37B
2.3%
N/A
United Kingdom
$1.33B
5.7%
-25%
United States
$1.25B
7.3%
-2%
United States
$1.24B
27.5%
-5%
United Kingdom
$1.1B
6.8%
-26%
United States
$1.0B
0%
N/A
United States
$911M
8.5%
-16%
United States
$867M
6.7%
-21%
United Kingdom
$745M
15.3%
8%
United States
$531M
7.8%
-22%
United States
$446M
3.3%
100%
United States
$432M
7.3%
-21%
United States
$428M
11.7%
-13%
United States
$418M
8.4%
-18%
United States
$414M
13.5%
-18%
United States
$413M
8.7%
-6%
United States
$378M
6.0%
-17%
United States
$375M
5.7%
-16%
United States
$374M
8.3%
20%
United States
$345M
0%
N/A
United States
$333M
12.3%
-19%
United States
$322M
14.0%
-12%
United States
$293M
5.7%
-16%
United Kingdom
$260M
13.9%
-19%
United States
$248M
0%
N/A
Luxembourg
$184M
N/A
N/A
United States
$181M
7.7%
-17%
United States
$180M
11.2%
-16%
Germany
$162M
5.3%
-27%
Brazil
$161M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$159M
24.2%
-6%
United States
$152M
5.6%
-13%
United Kingdom
$126M
1.0%
N/A
United States
$123M
10.5%
-15%
United Kingdom
$117M
3.9%
100%
United States
$97.0M
3.6%
-17%
United States
$89.2M
10.2%
-20%
Brazil
$88.4M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$88.4M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$87.6M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$85.7M
24.3%
-6%
United States
$82.8M
8.5%
-30%
United Kingdom
$81.7M
6.1%
-12%
Brazil
$73.6M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$70.8M
7.0%
-96%
United Kingdom
$66.9M
7.2%
-29%
Brazil
$55.4M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$55.0M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$52.7M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$51.5M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$51.0M
11.2%
-10%
United Kingdom
$50.3M
10.0%
-16%
Brazil
$47.9M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$45.8M
N/A
N/A
Ireland
$43.3M
3.9%
100%
Brazil
$37.3M
N/A
N/A
Ireland
$36.8M
4.3%
-17%
Brazil
$36.2M
N/A
N/A
Germany
$35.7M
1.3%
N/A
Brazil
$34.5M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$33.4M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$33.3M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$29.7M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$27.3M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$26.1M
N/A
N/A
United States
$25.1M
2.8%
N/A
Brazil
$23.4M
24.0%
-14%
Brazil
$21.4M
N/A
N/A
Ireland
$20.1M
7.1%
-26%
Brazil
$19.6M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$19.4M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$19.4M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$18.9M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$18.9M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$18.2M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$16.8M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$16.7M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$16.6M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$15.1M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$15.0M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$14.9M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$14.4M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$14.1M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$12.7M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$12.3M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$11.8M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$11.2M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$11.1M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$10.8M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$10.3M
N/A
N/A
Brazil
$10.1M
N/A
N/A
United States
$8.06M
4.0%
-20%
Brazil
$3.17M
N/A
N/A

Stewardship

Policy Engagement

D+
Performance Band

57%
Organisation Score

51%
Relationship Score

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess BNY Mellon

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions’ sustainable finance policy engagement. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess BNY Mellon - Relationships

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party.

In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.

Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
54%
 
54%
 
41%
 
41%
 
57%
 
57%
 
50%
 
50%
 
41%
 
41%
 
58%
 
58%
 
60%
 
60%
 
48%
 
48%
 
51%
 
51%
 
49%
 
49%
 
30%
 
30%
 
43%
 
43%
 
62%
 
62%
 
46%
 
46%
 
52%
 
52%
 
61%
 
61%
 
82%
 
82%