FinanceMap scores this financial institution in the following areas. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis
FinanceMap assesses these portfolios for this financial institution. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis.
Credit Agricole appears to have limited disclosure on governance of climate change. Its board/board committees appear to monitor climate-related issues, including the Risk Committee which examines the way in which climate-related risks are integrated into the overall operational strategy and risk management. Management level positions and/or committees appear to have some climate-related responsibilities, but reporting lacks granularity.
The organization appears to consider climate-related risks over different time horizons, including calculating a medium-term transition risk index for corporate client groups to manage transition challenges, but has not defined the specific climate-related risks relevant to its business over time. Credit Agricole has provided some examples of how it has considered the impact of climate-related risks and opportunities in its business planning, including how it is assisting clients in the energy transition and promoting climate smart objectives.
It is unclear whether Credit Agricole is aligned with TCFD on using climate scenarios to test the resilience of its business strategy. Its 2021 and 2022 Universal Registration Document states it tested four scenarios in 2017 and that is participated in ECB’s climate stress test in 2022, however, details on results of its stress testing lack detail. Additionally, the organization has not disclosed how it plans to respond to the implications identified in its scenario testing.
Credit Agricole has outlined some processes for identifying and assessing climate-related risks, for example, it uses the P9XCA procedure to calculate the order of magnitude of emissions financed and map them according to sector and geographical location. The organization manages environmental risks through applying the Equator Principles, CSR policies, and assessment of environmental and social aspects of transactions. It additionally appears to have integrated climate risks into its overall risk management approach.
The organization discloses some key metrics used to measure and manage climate-related risks and opportunities, for example, it has integrated climate into remuneration policies. With regard to its emissions disclosure, Credit Agricole fully discloses Scope 1 and 2 emissions but only has limited Scope 3 emissions. It has disclosed some Scope 3 Category 15 emissions, including the GHG emissions from the group’s investments and financing across various industries and geographic areas.
In July 2021, Credit Agricole joined the Net Zero Banking Alliance, and in June 2022, Credit Agricole announced oil and gas and automotive sector targets. The organization released updated interim targets in December 2022 for five sectors including oil and gas, power, automotive, commercial real estate, and cement.
Credit Agricole has established coal financing exclusion policies, which includes a phase out policy with strict timelines by 2030 for EU and OECD countries and 2040 for the rest of the world. The entity will also not provide financing to companies planning the construction of building new coal mines and plants and has excluded companies that generate more than 25% of their turnover in the thermal coal industry and have not adopted a transition strategy consistent with the objectives of the Paris Agreement.
With regard to oil and gas, the organization has set exclusionary policies that limit financing of certain unconventional projects. For example, Credit Agricole will not develop a relationship with companies that generate more than 30% of their activity from the extraction of non-conventional hydrocarbons. In December 2022, the organization announced it would not finance new oil extraction projects, but appears to provide financing for expanding natural gas infrastructure given due diligence.
Crédit Agricole appears to be advocating a position that is partially aligned with IPCC guidance on the role of nuclear in the energy mix and analyzes nuclear projects on 4 dimensions to ensure clients meet international safety standards. It has communicated support for the energy transition and disclosed its green bond framework, but it is unclear how it categorizes and assesses the eligibility for transactions in relation to renewable energy.
FinanceMap’s Climate Governance and Policies analysis assesses statements financial institutions (FIs) are making on how they are incorporating climate issues into their decision-making and operations using FinanceMap’s matrix methodology. This methodology is adapted from the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) recommendations and guidelines, Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA) or equivalent Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net-Zero (GFANZ) initiative reporting, and IPCC and IEA technology statements. The TCFD provide guidance on 11 recommendations across four areas which are reflected in our matrix: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets. Additional benchmarks have been introduced to strengthen the ambition of scoring criteria in the assessment of targets, which are supplemented by guidance from the NZBA or equivalent GFANZ initiatives.
Additionally, Science-Based Policy (SBP) benchmarks are used to measure alignment of an FIs technology positions with the science of climate change. These benchmarks are applied to an FIs internal policies on technologies including coal, oil, gas, nuclear, and renewables and also assesses its engagement with broader climate and energy policy issues such as advocacy on the role and importance of different strategy types in the future energy mix.
For each TCFD recommendation and technology, FIs statements are applied to a five point scoring scale ranging from +2 to -2, measuring alignment with the relevant benchmarks. The detailed scores for this FI are displayed below within each matrix cell.
The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions climate governance, targets and policies. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.
Fossil fuel companies are those whose primary sector falls within coal mining and services, or up-, mid-, and downstream oil and gas sectors. Green companies are defined as companies having over 75% revenue deriving from Substantial Contribution to Mitigation activities under the EU Taxonomy.
Portfolio Paris Alignment analysis of this institution's activities in this portfolio area assesses deals in 2020–2022.
Value Assessed: $231B
Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors to which this portfolio has exposure. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.
Fossil fuel companies are those whose primary sector falls within coal mining and services, or up-, mid-, and downstream oil and gas sectors. Green companies are defined as companies having over 75% revenue deriving from Substantial Contribution to Mitigation activities under the EU Taxonomy.
Portfolio Paris Alignment analysis of this institution's activities in this portfolio area assesses deals in 2020–2022.
Value Assessed: $103B
Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors to which this portfolio has exposure. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.
Fossil fuel companies are those whose primary sector falls within coal mining and services, or up-, mid-, and downstream oil and gas sectors. Green companies are defined as companies having over 75% revenue deriving from Substantial Contribution to Mitigation activities under the EU Taxonomy.
Portion of AUM Assessed: $257B
| Holding Name | Contribution to Sector Production |
|---|---|
| RWE AG | 19.3% |
| Enel SpA | 16.8% |
| Iberdrola SA | 11.0% |
| Fortum Oyj | 9.1% |
| EDP Energias de Portugal SA | 5.7% |
| Engie SA | 5.6% |
| Nextera Energy Inc | 2.0% |
| EDP Renovaveis SA | 1.3% |
| Orsted A/S | 1.1% |
| Clearway Energy Inc | 1.1% |
| Holding Name | Contribution to Sector Production |
|---|---|
| Stellantis NV | 39.4% |
| Volkswagen AG | 17.0% |
| Renault SA | 14.9% |
| Bayerische Motoren Werke AG | 5.9% |
| Toyota Motor Corp | 3.9% |
| Mercedes Benz Group AG | 3.5% |
| Mazda Motor Corp | 2.3% |
| Honda Motor Co Ltd | 2.0% |
| Nissan Motor Co Ltd | 1.8% |
| Suzuki Motor Corp | 1.5% |
| Holding Name | Contribution to Sector Production |
|---|---|
| China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd | 45.2% |
| Glencore PLC | 23.0% |
| Coal India Ltd | 18.2% |
| Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd | 10.0% |
| Adaro Energy Indonesia TBK PT | 3.2% |
| Shanxi Meijin Energy Co Ltd | 0.2% |
| Washington H Soul Pattinson and Company Ltd | 0.1% |
| Whitehaven Coal Ltd | 0.1% |
| Holding Name | Contribution to Sector Production |
|---|---|
| TotalEnergies SE | 30.2% |
| Eni SpA | 15.4% |
| Shell PLC | 11.2% |
| Repsol SA | 6.9% |
| Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobras | 6.5% |
| BP PLC | 4.8% |
| Chevron Corp | 3.4% |
| Exxon Mobil Corp | 3.2% |
| EQT Corp | 2.3% |
| EOG Resources Inc | 1.9% |
Credit Agricole's assessment is based on the activities of its primary asset manager subsidiary Amundi. Amundi appears to have had a positive influence on companies around climate.
Amundi has set climate change as a key priority in its engagement strategy, with a particular focus and framework centered around the energy transition. It is deepening its climate engagements with its “Ambition 2025” plan by expanding engagements on emissions reduction plans to 1000 additional companies. The asset manager appears to measure engagement progress with milestones, although the milestones lack detail in its reporting. It has a escalation strategy based on engagement outcomes that includes voting against management, public statements, etc.
Amundi appears to be actively engaging companies to transition in line with the Paris Agreement. For example, it has engaged with BHP, RWE, and the insurance sector on coal phase-outs and setting GHG emissions reduction targets. The asset manager has engaged with companies on climate policy influence, including engagements which led a Japanese automotive manufacturer to support climate policy and release a climate lobbying report. Additionally, it is an active participant in collaborative initiatives such as CA100+ and SBTi.
Amundi has described its stewardship governance and review structures as well as how it seeks input from clients to incorporate climate change into its investment products. The asset manager is partially transparent about engagements, providing some named and some anonymous case studies. It discloses its proxy voting record and outlines its proxy voting policy on climate issues.
The asset manager has demonstrated its use of shareholder authority on climate, co-filing a shareholder resolution at HSBC with ShareAction.
Insightia data suggests that Amundi is broadly supportive of AGM resolutions InfluenceMap categorizes as in line with the Paris Agreement, supporting 64% in 2019, 77.2% in 2020, 91.9% in 2021, and 87.9% in 2022.
FinanceMap's methodology to measure the engagement process on climate was developed in consultation with several of the world's leading asset managers and uses key aspects of the UK Financial Reporting Council's 2020 Stewardship Code . The Stewardship Code was chosen to benchmark engagement quality as it provides an ambitious framework and detailed definitions of what constitutes effective engagement. FinanceMap defines the term ‘engagement’ as referring to all investor actions undertaken to influence the management strategy of the companies they own including private communications with corporate management and appointed advisors; questions at AGMs/other company meetings; comments on the company in the media; escalation and the shareholder resolution process (filing, voting behavior). FinanceMap’s methodology breaks the engagement process down into a set of sub-activities and looks for evidence associated with these across publicly available data sources.
Climate-relevance categorization of shareholder resolutions is based on the IPCC’s Special Report on 1.5°C and its concluded need for “rapid and far-reaching transitions in land, energy, industry, buildings, transport, and cities.” FinanceMap scored voting on any resolution where the intent and likely outcome is consistent with this IPCC stated need. The voting data is drawn from asset managers' disclosures to the US Security Exchange Commission (SEC), asset manager websites (including third-party websites they link to), directly from the asset managers, and through specialist voting data provider Insightia. The full list of resolutions assessed is available here.
The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess asset managers' corporate engagement programs. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.
Crédit Agricole appears to be actively engaged on sustainable finance policy, with mixed positions. Crédit Agricole and its asset management subsidiary Amundi appear to independently engage with policy, although both with mixed positions, addressing a range of different sustainable finance policy strands and with some differing positions.
Crédit Agricole has stated support for the role of finance in reaching the goals of the Paris Agreement, and appears to support reform to make the financial sector more sustainable. Amundi has supported action to keep global temperature rise to 1.5C and to reach net-zero by 2050. In joint letters, Amundi has advocated for action to achieve net-zero by 2050 and has also advocated for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework to mandate the alignment of financial flows with biodiversity goals. In meetings with the European Commission in 2022, Amundi further highlighted the need for financial institutions to align their actions with their targets.
In feedback to the Commission on the Renewed Strategy in 2020, Crédit Agricole advocated for the inclusion of more transitional activities in the taxonomy but opposed the expansion of the taxonomy to cover environmentally harmful activities. In response to the Commission in 2021, Crédit Agricole did recommend a one-year delay to the taxonomy’s implementation after the disclosures of non-financial companies are implemented. In meetings with the Commission Director General in 2022, Amundi recommended a “dynamic approach” to the taxonomy, which appeared to suggest the support of a weaker definition of green activities.
In a consultation response to the European Commission in 2020, Amundi appeared to support an ambitious review of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD). In joint statements in 2021, Amundi advocated for mandatory implementation of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), and for EU policymakers to increase the scope of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD, which replaced the NFRD) in order to respond to the needs of investors in Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) disclosures. In response to the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) in 2022, on the proposal for the European Sustainability Requirement Standards under the CSRD, Crédit Agricole argued against the “volume and complexity” of the disclosure requirements. In the same consultation, subsidiary Crédit Agricole Assurances similarly argued against the level of sector-agnostic disclosures and suggested some were too granular. In response to the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) on the Climate and Sustainability Disclosure Drafts in 2022, Amundi advocated for further ambition including a double materiality approach. However, in a research paper in 2022, Amundi suggested there was an issue in encouraging asset owners and managers to go beyond scope 1 and 2 disclosures, highlighting challenges with disclosing scope 3 emissions and portfolio alignment. In a joint statement in 2022, Amundi did advocate for the assessment and disclosure of nature-related impacts and dependencies.
In feedback to the Commission in 2020, both Crédit Agricole and Amundi supported the need for EU level verification of the EU Green Bond Standard (GBS). In 2020, an article on the EFAMA website featured Thierry Bogaty (Head of ESG Strategy at Amundi) stating top-line support for the EU Ecolabel but arguing for weaker green criteria on the basis that more investments would be eligible.
In feedback to the Commission in 2020, both Crédit Agricole and Amundi appeared to support for the consideration of adverse impacts on sustainability within fiduciary duty, but only where there is a clear mandate from the asset owner to do so. However, Amundi argued against the prescriptiveness of the proposed Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) in comments to the European Supervisory Authorities’ (ESAs) consultation in 2020.
At the group level, Crédit Agricole has disclosed some general positions on its website, but has not referenced specific policies or described engagement activities. Amundi discloses some of the sustainable finance policies it is tracking with some details of engagement, but did not describe positions taken. Amundi has listed its trade association memberships but has not clearly described the management of its indirect influence. There does not appear to be group level disclosure of indirect sustainable finance policy engagement, although Crédit Agricole has disclosed corporate membership of the board in its financial reporting.
InfluenceMap’s methodology for assessing lobbying on sustainable finance policy closely follows InfluenceMap’s established methodology on climate policy engagement, which is used extensively by investors, including via the Climate Action 100+ investor engagement process. Our full methodology can be found here.
Under our assessment of sustainable finance lobbying, InfluenceMap considers engagement on all financial policies which intersect with climate and/or other sustainability issues. The analysis takes into account both the engagement of the financial institution and the activities of industry associations they hold membership of.
InfluenceMap’s methodology covers seven publicly available data sources, searching for evidence of engagement and corporate positioning since 2017. To determine the policy issues within the scope of the analysis, InfluenceMap breaks down sustainable finance policy engagement into a series of subcategories, or 'queries'. These are designed to cover high-level issues relating to the importance of sustainable finance, as well as more specific areas of sustainable finance policymaking. InfluenceMap’s research process searches for evidence of an organization's engagement with each sustainable finance policy issue, across each of the data sources.
The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions’ sustainable finance policy engagement. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.
In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party.
In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Christine Cremel is on the board of directors of ISDA. (Last checked November 2023)
Christine Cremel (Managing Director, Head of Onboarding, Transaction Management & Clearing - Credit Agricole)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Credit Agricole is a member of ISDA.
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Christine Cremel is on the board of directors of ISDA. (Last checked November 2023)
Christine Cremel (Managing Director, Head of Onboarding, Transaction Management & Clearing - Credit Agricole)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Credit Agricole is a member of ISDA.
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Rita Sqalli is on the AFME board of directors (last checked September 2023).
Rita Sqalli (Global Chief Operating Officer and Chief of Staff for Global Markets)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Pierre Gay is on the AFME board of directors
Pierre Gay (Head of Global Markets Division, Crédit Agricole)
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Rita Sqalli is on the AFME board of directors (last checked September 2023).
Rita Sqalli (Global Chief Operating Officer and Chief of Staff for Global Markets)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Pierre Gay is on the AFME board of directors
Pierre Gay (Head of Global Markets Division, Crédit Agricole)
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
A. AUCOIN is a board member of the EACB (last checked September 2023).
A. AUCOIN (Fédération Nationale du Crédit Agricole)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
A. AUCOIN is a board member of the EACB (last checked September 2023).
A. AUCOIN (Fédération Nationale du Crédit Agricole)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
As of February 2023, Credit Agricole Securities is a member of SIFMA
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
As of February 2023, Kashif Zafar is on the board of SIFMA.
Kashif Zafar (Head of the Global Markets Division for the Americas, Credit Agricole)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
As of February 2023, Credit Agricole Securities is a member of SIFMA
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
As of February 2023, Kashif Zafar is on the board of SIFMA.
Kashif Zafar (Head of the Global Markets Division for the Americas, Credit Agricole)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
Amundi is a corporate member at EFAMA (last checked September 2023)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
An Amundi staff member is co-chair of Stewardship, Market Integrity and ESG Investment committee. Scoring Note: position not scored, as this no longer seems to be the case.
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
Bernard DE WIT is a corporate member representative of the EFAMA board of directors. Scoring Note: position not scored, as this no longer seems to be the case. (last checked July 2023).
Mr Bernard DE WIT (Amundi)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
Nicolas CALCOEN is the president of the EFAMA board of directors. Scoring Note: position not scored, as this no longer seems to be the case.
Nicolas CALCOEN (Amundi AM)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
Amundi is a corporate member at EFAMA (last checked September 2023)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
An Amundi staff member is co-chair of Stewardship, Market Integrity and ESG Investment committee. Scoring Note: position not scored, as this no longer seems to be the case.
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
Bernard DE WIT is a corporate member representative of the EFAMA board of directors. Scoring Note: position not scored, as this no longer seems to be the case. (last checked July 2023).
Mr Bernard DE WIT (Amundi)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
Nicolas CALCOEN is the president of the EFAMA board of directors. Scoring Note: position not scored, as this no longer seems to be the case.
Nicolas CALCOEN (Amundi AM)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Caroline Le Meaux is a board member of the IIGCC (last checked September 2023).
Caroline Le Meaux (Head of ESG Research, Engagement at Amundi)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Amundi Asset Management is a member of the IIGCC (last checked September 2023).
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Caroline Le Meaux is a board member of the IIGCC (last checked September 2023).
Caroline Le Meaux (Head of ESG Research, Engagement at Amundi)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Amundi Asset Management is a member of the IIGCC (last checked September 2023).
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
As of February 2023, Amundi Asset Management and Credit Agricole Economic Research are members of the IIF
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
As of February 2023, Amundi Asset Management and Credit Agricole Economic Research are members of the IIF
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Amundi Asset Management is a member of the Investment Association (last checked September 2023)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Philippe D'Orgeval is a board member at The Investment Association. As of February 2023, he is no longer a board member.
Philippe D'Orgeval (CEO - Amundi Asset Management)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Amundi Asset Management is a member of the Investment Association (last checked September 2023)
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Philippe D'Orgeval is a board member at The Investment Association. As of February 2023, he is no longer a board member.
Philippe D'Orgeval (CEO - Amundi Asset Management)
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Crédit Agricole is a member of the French Banking Federation which is a national association member of EBF (last checked September 2023).
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Crédit Agricole is a member of the French Banking Federation which is a national association member of EBF (last checked September 2023).
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
CREDIT AGRICOLE ASSURANCES RETRAITE and CREDIT AGRICOLE INDOSUEZ RISK SOLUTIONS ASSURANCES – CAIRS ASSURANCES are members of France Assurers which is a national association member of Insurance Europe
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
CAISSE D'ASSURANCES MUTUELLES DU CREDIT AGRICOLE (CAMCA) is a member of La Fédération Française de l’Assurance which is a national association member of Insurance Europe
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
CREDIT AGRICOLE ASSURANCES RETRAITE and CREDIT AGRICOLE INDOSUEZ RISK SOLUTIONS ASSURANCES – CAIRS ASSURANCES are members of France Assurers which is a national association member of Insurance Europe
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
CAISSE D'ASSURANCES MUTUELLES DU CREDIT AGRICOLE (CAMCA) is a member of La Fédération Française de l’Assurance which is a national association member of Insurance Europe
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Amundi Asset Management is a member of PensioPlus which is a national association member of PensionsEurope (last checked September 2023).
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Amundi is a corporate/supporter member of PensionsEurope. As of January 2022, Amundi is no longer a corporate/supporter member of PensionsEurope.
not specified
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Amundi Asset Management is a member of PensioPlus which is a national association member of PensionsEurope (last checked September 2023).
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Amundi is a corporate/supporter member of PensionsEurope. As of January 2022, Amundi is no longer a corporate/supporter member of PensionsEurope.
not specified
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Crédit Agricole Securities Asia BV and Amundi are the direct member of JSDA.
not specified
--no extract--
InfluenceMap Data Point on Corporate - Influencer Relationship
(1 = weak, 10 = strong)
Crédit Agricole Securities Asia BV and Amundi are the direct member of JSDA.
not specified
--no extract--
Open PDF file of Data Source