Goldman Sachs

United States

$2.67T in AUM

$1.46T in Total Assets

Qualitative Analysis

FinanceMap scores this financial institution in the following areas. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis

FinanceMap Scores

Governance Score

Stewardship Score

Policy Engagement Score

Top Line Target

Net Zero

Portfolio Analysis

FinanceMap assesses these portfolios for this financial institution. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis.

Activity Stream
Value Assessed
Portfolio Paris Alignment Score
Exposure to Fossil Fuels
Corporate Lending
$256B
-22%
0.8%
Bond Underwriting
$250B
-27%
6.9%
Equity Underwriting
$244B
-28%
1.3%
Equity Asset Management
$140B
-22%
8.9%

Governance

D
Performance Band

49%
Organisation Score

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Goldman Sachs

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions climate governance, targets and policies. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portfolio Paris Alignment analysis of this institution's activities in this portfolio area in 2020–2021.

Corporate Lending Paris Alignment

Value Assessed: $256B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors to which this portfolio has exposure. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.

Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portfolio Paris Alignment analysis of this institution's activities in this portfolio area in 2020–2021.

Bond Underwriting Paris Alignment

Value Assessed: $250B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors to which this portfolio has exposure. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.

Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portfolio Paris Alignment analysis of this institution's activities in this portfolio area in 2020–2021.

Equity Underwriting Paris Alignment

Value Assessed: $244B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors to which this portfolio has exposure. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.

Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Exposure Analysis

Last Updated - 28/02/2023

Fossil fuel production companies are defined as those with primary sector of operations in the up-, mid-, and/or downstream segments of fossil fuel production. Green companies are defined as companies having over 75% revenue deriving from Substantial Contribution to Mitigation activities under the EU Taxonomy.

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Equity Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portion of AUM Assessed: $140B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors in which the asset manager has shareholdings. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.
Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Iberdrola SA7.9%
Enel SpA7.9%
Engie SA5.6%
Nextera Energy Inc5.4%
AES Corp5.2%
NTPC Ltd4.9%
Fortis Inc4.7%
PGE Polska Grupa Energetyczna SA3.5%
Duke Energy Corp2.8%
Drax Group PLC2.4%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Stellantis NV23.4%
Kia Corp20.5%
General Motors Co16.1%
Ford Motor Co4.0%
Honda Motor Co Ltd4.0%
Mazda Motor Corp3.4%
Toyota Motor Corp3.4%
Hyundai Motor Co3.0%
BYD Co Ltd2.6%
Suzuki Motor Corp2.5%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Glencore PLC52.9%
Whitehaven Coal Ltd16.2%
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd12.6%
Peabody Energy Corp9.1%
Warrior Met Coal Inc2.2%
Arch Resources Inc1.5%
Jastrzebska Spolka Weglowa SA1.3%
Alpha Metallurgical Resources Inc1.3%
NACCO Industries Inc0.9%
Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd0.5%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobras34.5%
TotalEnergies SE9.3%
NK Rosneft' PAO8.9%
Eni SpA7.7%
NK Lukoil PAO7.5%
Shell PLC5.8%
Tourmaline Oil Corp4.5%
Exxon Mobil Corp4.3%
BP PLC1.3%
Chesapeake Energy Corp1.0%

Funds Assessed

All equity funds that FinanceMap has identified as being managed by this asset manager. Click through to a fund's profile page to view in-depth analysis.
Fund Name
Fund Domicile
TNA
Exposure
Portfolio Paris Alignment
United States
$2.56B
3.0%
-13%
United States
$2.44B
3.1%
-20%
United States
$1.97B
2.6%
N/A
Luxembourg
$1.88B
8.8%
-36%
United States
$1.6B
9.6%
-16%
United States
$1.2B
11.4%
-19%
Luxembourg
$1.13B
5.1%
-24%
United States
$1.08B
7.4%
-19%
Netherlands
$1.04B
14.0%
-9%
Netherlands
$985M
8.3%
-17%
United States
$923M
5.6%
-26%
United States
$904M
2.1%
N/A
United States
$781M
8.0%
-22%
Netherlands
$659M
8.3%
-17%
Luxembourg
$652M
11.7%
-15%
United States
$648M
11.8%
-2%
United States
$470M
2.3%
N/A
United States
$449M
11.5%
-19%
United States
$446M
14.0%
-17%
Luxembourg
$412M
7.5%
-20%
United States
$411M
13.3%
-20%
United States
$383M
13.9%
-17%
Luxembourg
$335M
6.6%
-18%
United States
$318M
5.0%
0%
United States
$269M
79.2%
-9%
Poland
$267M
17.4%
-16%
United States
$250M
27.1%
-17%
Luxembourg
$218M
16.8%
-3%
Luxembourg
$208M
17.3%
-15%
Luxembourg
$203M
16.7%
-8%
Luxembourg
$188M
15.2%
-4%
Luxembourg
$167M
15.5%
-11%
United States
$162M
13.9%
-3%
United States
$161M
8.3%
-21%
Luxembourg
$136M
11.6%
-13%
United States
$128M
4.2%
-2%
United States
$121M
1.7%
N/A
United States
$105M
8.6%
-17%
France
$103M
N/A
N/A
Luxembourg
$94.5M
70.3%
-6%
United States
$68.2M
6.5%
-6%
United States
$60.1M
2.0%
N/A
Netherlands
$48.6M
4.1%
-22%
Luxembourg
$47.2M
N/A
N/A
United States
$45.7M
16.3%
-20%
United States
$42.4M
8.2%
-12%
Japan
$40.8M
8.7%
-12%
Netherlands
$38.0M
0%
N/A
Luxembourg
$35.2M
N/A
N/A
United States
$32.8M
3.8%
-8%
Poland
$31.0M
N/A
N/A
Luxembourg
$29.1M
0%
N/A
Luxembourg
$23.9M
33.8%
-12%
United States
$22.1M
4.7%
-15%
Luxembourg
$17.6M
N/A
N/A
Japan
$16.8M
3.3%
-42%
United States
$12.4M
11.3%
-23%
Luxembourg
$5.6M
N/A
N/A
Luxembourg
$3.78M
N/A
N/A

Stewardship

C
Performance Band

34%
Voting Percentage

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Goldman Sachs

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess asset managers' corporate engagement programs. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Policy Engagement

D
Performance Band

46%
Organisation Score

50%
Relationship Score

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Goldman Sachs

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions’ sustainable finance policy engagement. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Goldman Sachs - Relationships

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party.

In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.

Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
54%
 
54%
 
50%
 
50%
 
41%
 
41%
 
58%
 
58%
 
44%
 
44%
 
48%
 
48%
 
51%
 
51%
 
57%
 
57%
 
41%
 
41%
 
30%
 
30%
 
49%
 
49%
 
46%
 
46%
 
62%
 
62%
 
60%
 
60%
 
52%
 
52%
 
47%
 
47%
 
61%
 
61%
 
82%
 
82%