Qualitative Analysis

FinanceMap scores this financial institution in the following areas. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis

FinanceMap Scores

Stewardship Score

Policy Engagement Score

Top Line Target

Net Zero

Portfolio Analysis

FinanceMap assesses these portfolios for this financial institution. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis.

Activity Stream
Value Assessed
Portfolio Paris Alignment Score
Exposure to Fossil Fuels
Equity Asset Management
$221B
-23%
2.0%

Exposure Analysis

Last Updated - 28/02/2023

Fossil fuel production companies are defined as those with primary sector of operations in the up-, mid-, and/or downstream segments of fossil fuel production. Green companies are defined as companies having over 75% revenue deriving from Substantial Contribution to Mitigation activities under the EU Taxonomy.

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Equity Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portion of AUM Assessed: $221B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors in which the asset manager has shareholdings. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.
Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Kansai Electric Power Co Inc19.0%
Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc15.0%
Electric Power Development Co Ltd14.2%
Kyushu Electric Power Co Inc14.2%
Tohoku Electric Power Co Inc12.7%
Chubu Electric Power Co Inc7.3%
Hokkaido Electric Power Company Incorporated4.8%
Hokuriku Electric Power Co4.3%
Shikoku Electric Power Co Inc3.6%
Okinawa Electric Power Co Inc1.1%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Toyota Motor Corp33.0%
Honda Motor Co Ltd23.7%
Suzuki Motor Corp18.4%
Nissan Motor Co Ltd11.5%
Mazda Motor Corp6.0%
Subaru Corp4.2%
Mitsubishi Motors Corp2.0%
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd0.6%
General Motors Co0.1%
Ford Motor Co0.1%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd37.5%
Glencore PLC27.6%
Coal India Ltd17.7%
Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd8.5%
Exxaro Resources Ltd4.5%
Adaro Energy Indonesia TBK PT2.3%
United Tractors Tbk PT1.1%
Washington H Soul Pattinson and Company Ltd0.6%
Adani Enterprises Ltd0.1%
Bukit Asam Tbk PT<0.1%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Inpex Corp27.5%
Mitsui & Co Ltd22.4%
ENEOS Holdings Inc14.3%
Tokyo Gas Co Ltd8.2%
Osaka Gas Co Ltd4.3%
Idemitsu Kosan Co Ltd3.7%
Cosmo Energy Holdings Co Ltd2.8%
Exxon Mobil Corp2.2%
Japan Petroleum Exploration Co Ltd1.9%
Chevron Corp1.7%

Funds Assessed

All equity funds that FinanceMap has identified as being managed by this asset manager. Click through to a fund's profile page to view in-depth analysis.
Fund Name
Fund Domicile
TNA
Exposure
Portfolio Paris Alignment
Japan
$1.83B
15.1%
-38%
Japan
$341M
7.8%
-20%
Japan
$334M
14.0%
-9%
Taiwan
$308M
N/A
N/A
United States
$230M
4.0%
-16%
Japan
$229M
4.1%
-22%
Japan
$152M
7.6%
-25%
Japan
$115M
3.6%
-12%
Japan
$91.1M
4.8%
-6%
Japan
$89.2M
N/A
N/A
Japan
$83.8M
0%
N/A
Japan
$79.9M
0%
N/A
Japan
$61.7M
5.5%
-30%
Japan
$60.2M
0%
N/A
Japan
$56.1M
12.0%
-15%
Taiwan
$54.7M
N/A
N/A
Germany
$51.1M
5.9%
-50%
Taiwan
$35.8M
N/A
N/A
Japan
$34.7M
8.1%
-25%
Japan
$30.7M
6.5%
-18%
Japan
$30.1M
10.3%
-100%
Japan
$27.6M
3.1%
-19%
Japan
$23.2M
6.5%
-18%
Taiwan
$22.9M
N/A
N/A
Japan
$22.4M
8.4%
-17%
Japan
$20.4M
11.4%
-15%
Taiwan
$19.5M
N/A
N/A
Japan
$19.1M
6.3%
-18%
Japan
$18.4M
7.3%
-19%
Taiwan
$18.4M
N/A
N/A
Japan
$14.0M
6.5%
-18%
Japan
$4.85M
2.9%
N/A

Stewardship

C+
Performance Band

N/A
Voting Percentage

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Nomura

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess asset managers' corporate engagement programs. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Policy Engagement

C-
Performance Band

N/A
Organisation Score

50%
Relationship Score

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Nomura

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions’ sustainable finance policy engagement. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess Nomura - Relationships

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party.

In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.

Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
54%
 
54%
 
50%
 
50%
 
61%
 
61%
 
41%
 
41%
 
44%
 
44%
 
58%
 
58%
 
60%
 
60%
 
47%
 
47%
 
51%
 
51%