TIAA

United States

$1.18T in AUM

Qualitative Analysis

FinanceMap scores this financial institution in the following areas. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis

FinanceMap Scores

Stewardship Score

Policy Engagement Score

Top Line Target

Net Zero

Portfolio Analysis

FinanceMap assesses these portfolios for this financial institution. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis.

Activity Stream
Value Assessed
Portfolio Paris Alignment Score
Exposure to Fossil Fuels
Equity Asset Management
$335B
-19%
4.9%

Exposure Analysis

Last Updated - 28/02/2023

Fossil fuel production companies are defined as those with primary sector of operations in the up-, mid-, and/or downstream segments of fossil fuel production. Green companies are defined as companies having over 75% revenue deriving from Substantial Contribution to Mitigation activities under the EU Taxonomy.

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Equity Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portion of AUM Assessed: $335B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors in which the asset manager has shareholdings. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.
Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Nextera Energy Inc9.3%
RWE AG8.6%
Enel SpA7.2%
American Electric Power Company Inc5.6%
Alliant Energy Corp3.7%
Vistra Corp3.4%
Duke Energy Corp3.1%
Engie SA2.8%
Ameren Corp2.8%
Dominion Energy Inc2.7%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Toyota Motor Corp22.5%
Volkswagen AG10.8%
General Motors Co8.5%
Ford Motor Co7.2%
Honda Motor Co Ltd5.2%
Great Wall Motor Co Ltd5.1%
Stellantis NV4.5%
Renault SA4.5%
Suzuki Motor Corp4.3%
Hyundai Motor Co3.5%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Peabody Energy Corp22.1%
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd19.6%
Glencore PLC15.7%
Coal India Ltd8.6%
Arch Resources Inc7.8%
Indika Energy Tbk PT4.4%
Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd4.1%
CONSOL Energy Inc3.6%
Exxaro Resources Ltd3.0%
NACCO Industries Inc2.3%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
EQT Corp10.2%
Exxon Mobil Corp9.0%
Conocophillips8.2%
Shell PLC7.6%
Chevron Corp6.6%
BP PLC6.1%
EOG Resources Inc5.6%
Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobras5.4%
Antero Resources Corp5.2%
Pioneer Natural Resources Co3.7%

Funds Assessed

All equity funds that FinanceMap has identified as being managed by this asset manager. Click through to a fund's profile page to view in-depth analysis.
Fund Name
Fund Domicile
TNA
Exposure
Portfolio Paris Alignment
United States
$108B
8.0%
-19%
United States
$35.2B
7.5%
-20%
United States
$28.6B
N/A
N/A
United States
$26.5B
4.3%
-8%
United States
$22.5B
9.8%
-18%
United States
$20.0B
7.4%
-20%
United States
$19.7B
10.5%
-13%
United States
$9.18B
3.6%
11%
United States
$7.87B
11.6%
-20%
United States
$7.08B
8.2%
-21%
United States
$6.45B
15.6%
-13%
United States
$6.01B
7.4%
-16%
United States
$5.65B
7.5%
-15%
United States
$5.2B
11.9%
-16%
United States
$4.72B
11.7%
-20%
United States
$4.68B
3.6%
-1%
United States
$3.27B
4.3%
-17%
United States
$3.2B
10.7%
-17%
United States
$2.69B
3.3%
-16%
United States
$2.28B
5.4%
-19%
United States
$1.77B
9.6%
-19%
United States
$1.63B
3.1%
-28%
United States
$1.55B
6.3%
-32%
United States
$1.35B
8.3%
-20%
United States
$1.11B
<1%
N/A
United States
$1.09B
0%
N/A
United States
$1.09B
7.5%
-20%
United States
$1.09B
2.4%
N/A
United States
$984M
3.8%
37%
United States
$678M
7.4%
-20%
United States
$581M
N/A
N/A
United States
$549M
7.4%
-13%
United States
$509M
27.1%
-17%
United States
$464M
13.2%
-22%
United States
$382M
12.4%
-23%
United States
$351M
2.2%
N/A
United States
$345M
1.8%
N/A
United States
$276M
8.1%
-16%
United States
$255M
0%
N/A
United States
$220M
3.2%
-100%
United States
$200M
7.3%
-20%
United States
$157M
11.0%
-15%
United States
$133M
14.6%
-17%
United States
$126M
15.1%
-13%
United States
$123M
3.6%
-1%
United States
$110M
7.7%
-10%
United States
$95.7M
9.9%
-15%
United States
$89.7M
1.6%
N/A
United States
$79.8M
7.4%
-16%
United States
$78.2M
11.7%
-20%
United States
$61.7M
3.3%
-17%
United States
$61.6M
0%
N/A
United States
$57.8M
2.5%
N/A
United States
$42.9M
10.2%
-10%
United States
$33.6M
5.1%
-8%
United States
$23.3M
3.4%
-10%
United States
$20.2M
11.6%
-17%
United States
$18.0M
9.6%
-12%
United States
$9.6M
2.8%
N/A
United States
$5.3M
9.1%
-16%

Stewardship

C
Performance Band

32%
Voting Percentage

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess TIAA

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess asset managers' corporate engagement programs. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Policy Engagement

C-
Performance Band

61%
Organisation Score

43%
Relationship Score

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess TIAA

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions’ sustainable finance policy engagement. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess TIAA - Relationships

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party.

In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.

Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
30%
 
30%
 
44%
 
44%
 
41%
 
41%
 
58%
 
58%
 
40%
 
40%
 
55%
 
55%