abrdn

United Kingdom

$454B in AUM

Qualitative Analysis

FinanceMap scores this financial institution in the following areas. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis

FinanceMap Scores

Stewardship Score

Policy Engagement Score

Top Line Target

Net Zero

Portfolio Analysis

FinanceMap assesses these portfolios for this financial institution. Please navigate to the relevant tab for in-depth analysis.

Activity Stream
Value Assessed
Portfolio Paris Alignment Score
Exposure to Fossil Fuels
Equity Asset Management
$56.2B
-9%
3.9%

Exposure Analysis

Last Updated - 28/02/2023

Fossil fuel companies are those whose primary sector falls within coal mining and services, or up-, mid-, and downstream oil and gas sectors. Green companies are defined as companies having over 75% revenue deriving from Substantial Contribution to Mitigation activities under the EU Taxonomy.

Portfolio Paris Alignment

Equity Portfolio Paris Alignment

Portion of AUM Assessed: $56.2B

Portfolio Paris Alignment by Sector

Sector Paris Alignment scores for the sectors in which the asset manager has shareholdings. FinanceMap Paris Alignment analysis is limited to the automotive, upstream fossil fuel, and power sectors.
Sector
% of Portfolio Value
Sector Paris Alignment

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Renew Energy Global PLC14.2%
Enel SpA13.1%
RWE AG10.7%
Engie SA10.2%
SSE PLC7.3%
Drax Group PLC5.8%
Azure Power Global Ltd4.6%
Clearway Energy Inc4.0%
Nextera Energy Inc3.4%
Sembcorp Industries Ltd3.3%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Maruti Suzuki India Ltd47.1%
Toyota Motor Corp10.2%
Mercedes Benz Group AG6.3%
Honda Motor Co Ltd4.2%
Kia Corp3.3%
Stellantis NV3.1%
General Motors Co3.0%
Great Wall Motor Co Ltd3.0%
SAIC Motor Corp Ltd2.8%
Hyundai Motor Co2.5%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Glencore PLC56.2%
Coal India Ltd16.4%
China Shenhua Energy Co Ltd15.7%
Adaro Energy Indonesia TBK PT4.7%
Yankuang Energy Group Co Ltd4.6%
Exxaro Resources Ltd0.9%
United Tractors Tbk PT0.7%
Washington H Soul Pattinson and Company Ltd0.3%
Inner Mongolia Yitai Coal Co Ltd0.2%
Banpu PCL0.1%

Portfolio Forecast Production in Sector

Holding NameContribution to Sector Production
Novatek PAO51.5%
BP PLC15.1%
Shell PLC9.5%
TotalEnergies SE7.4%
Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobras2.4%
Woodside Energy Group Ltd1.8%
Tullow Oil PLC1.5%
Serica Energy PLC1.5%
Harbour Energy PLC0.9%
Exxon Mobil Corp0.8%

Funds Assessed

All equity funds that FinanceMap has identified as being managed by this asset manager. Click through to a fund's profile page to view in-depth analysis.
Fund Name
Fund Domicile
TNA
Exposure
Portfolio Paris Alignment
United Kingdom
$2.2B
8.1%
-19%
United Kingdom
$2.19B
4.8%
-10%
United States
$2.18B
7.2%
-12%
United Kingdom
$2.18B
6.9%
-10%
United Kingdom
$2.02B
14.9%
-10%
United Kingdom
$2.01B
7.8%
-7%
United Kingdom
$1.44B
1.3%
N/A
United Kingdom
$1.4B
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$1.19B
13.4%
-28%
United Kingdom
$1.1B
8.2%
-21%
United Kingdom
$1.09B
7.1%
80%
Luxembourg
$978M
10.3%
27%
United States
$973M
6.8%
-20%
United Kingdom
$760M
5.8%
-11%
United States
$647M
1.3%
N/A
United Kingdom
$620M
20.4%
-33%
United Kingdom
$582M
5.6%
94%
Singapore
$578M
2.5%
N/A
United Kingdom
$538M
10.2%
-13%
United Kingdom
$536M
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$535M
15.8%
-6%
United Kingdom
$517M
18.5%
-19%
United Kingdom
$515M
2.6%
N/A
United Kingdom
$504M
0%
N/A
Singapore
$494M
6.0%
60%
Singapore
$484M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$482M
6.5%
-44%
United Kingdom
$458M
17.2%
-15%
United States
$452M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$443M
4.3%
-100%
United Kingdom
$441M
10.0%
-10%
United Kingdom
$403M
26.5%
-50%
United Kingdom
$386M
2.8%
N/A
United Kingdom
$377M
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$375M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$355M
1.8%
N/A
United Kingdom
$355M
4.4%
-22%
United Kingdom
$350M
<1%
N/A
United States
$347M
2.1%
N/A
United Kingdom
$304M
2.6%
N/A
United Kingdom
$296M
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$290M
5.8%
-66%
United Kingdom
$287M
11.2%
-13%
United Kingdom
$285M
7.5%
-3%
United Kingdom
$282M
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$270M
16.6%
-2%
United Kingdom
$256M
0%
N/A
Thailand
$206M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$203M
11.6%
-12%
United Kingdom
$199M
14.1%
-27%
United Kingdom
$196M
9.9%
-22%
United Kingdom
$182M
8.7%
-18%
United States
$178M
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$142M
10.7%
-16%
United Kingdom
$141M
N/A
N/A
United States
$135M
7.0%
-70%
United Kingdom
$133M
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$132M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$128M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$124M
3.8%
-33%
United States
$124M
N/A
N/A
United States
$107M
6.3%
-77%
United Kingdom
$105M
7.0%
-22%
United Kingdom
$105M
7.3%
-19%
United Kingdom
$99.8M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$99.4M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$98.8M
16.9%
-42%
United Kingdom
$89.5M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$89.5M
1.6%
N/A
United Kingdom
$86.7M
10.4%
-23%
United Kingdom
$86.1M
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$86.1M
2.1%
N/A
United States
$84.8M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$75.8M
12.0%
-2%
Thailand
$69.7M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$63.7M
3.9%
-33%
United Kingdom
$63.0M
17.3%
-4%
United Kingdom
$60.7M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$53.8M
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$49.5M
0%
N/A
United States
$49.1M
6.5%
15%
United States
$48.0M
24.9%
-17%
United Kingdom
$44.1M
5.5%
6%
United States
$43.9M
4.7%
100%
United States
$42.6M
0%
N/A
Singapore
$37.4M
3.7%
-14%
Singapore
$36.0M
0%
N/A
Thailand
$35.8M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$35.4M
7.6%
-7%
Singapore
$33.1M
11.1%
-42%
United Kingdom
$33.0M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$29.8M
7.2%
30%
United Kingdom
$28.2M
N/A
N/A
Thailand
$27.2M
N/A
N/A
United States
$26.4M
7.4%
4%
United Kingdom
$18.8M
N/A
N/A
United Kingdom
$17.4M
5.3%
100%
Japan
$16.1M
4.5%
-33%
Singapore
$11.9M
0%
N/A
United Kingdom
$11.0M
N/A
N/A

Stewardship

B
Performance Band

36%
Voting Percentage

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess abrdn

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess asset managers' corporate engagement programs. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Policy Engagement

C-
Performance Band

59%
Organisation Score

55%
Relationship Score

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess abrdn

The following table outlines the key queries and data sources, which FinanceMap uses to assess financial institutions’ sustainable finance policy engagement. Every evidence piece is assessed on a five-point scale of -2,-1,0,1,2 or NA (not applicable)/NS (not scored). All queries, data sources, and evidence pieces are weighted against one another in a matrix system to arrive at a final top-level score. Clicking on specific cells will load the underlying evidence and information on how it has been assessed.

Detailed Evidence Used to Assess abrdn - Relationships

In this section, we depict graphically the relationships the corporation has with trade associations, federations, advocacy groups and other third parties who may be acting on their behalf to influence climate change policy. Each of the columns above represents one relationship the corporation appears to have with such a third party.

In these columns, the top, dark section represents the strength of the relationship the corporation has with the influencer. For example if a corporation's senior executive also held a key role in the trade association, we would deem this to be a strong relationship and it would be on the far left of the chart above, with the weaker ones to the right. Click on these grey shaded upper sections for details of these relationships. The middle section contains a link to the organization score details of the influencer concerned, so you can see the details of its climate change policy influence. Click on the middle sections for for details of the trade associations. The lower section contains the organization score of that influencer, the lower the more negatively it is influencing climate policy.

Strength of Relationship
STRONG
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEAK
 
41%
 
41%
 
60%
 
60%
 
51%
 
51%
 
50%
 
50%
 
49%
 
49%
 
71%
 
71%
 
56%
 
56%
 
49%
 
49%
 
82%
 
82%
 
55%
 
55%